Search: section 68

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur39 Delhi26 Mumbai26 Karnataka21 Chennai21 Hyderabad16 Ahmedabad16 Indore12 Pune11 Visakhapatnam10 Kolkata9 Agra8 Surat7 Bangalore6 Rajkot4 Ranchi3 Jabalpur2 Cuttack2 Nagpur2 SC1 Amritsar1 Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 153C5 Section 2633 Section 153A(1)3 Section 271D3 Section 153C(1)2 Section 142(1)2 Section 143(2)2 Section 143(3)2 Cash Deposit2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SATNA vs. SHRI JAMMU BEG,

In the result, the levy of penalty is cancelled and the appeal of the appellant is allowed

ITA 196/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: FixedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleacit, Vs. Shri Jammu Beg, Satna, M/S Mirza Transport, Madhya Pradesh. Main Road, Waidhan, Singrauli. Madhya Pradesh.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT-DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271D

68 and imposed penalty under Sections 271Dand 271E. The tribunal deleted penalty imposed by AO. The High Court held

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SATNA vs. SHRI JAMMU BEG,

SHRI NITIN SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, JABALPUR

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SATNA vs. SHRI JAMMU BEG,

SHRI NITIN SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, JABALPUR