BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 153Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,757Mumbai1,761Chennai573Bangalore545Hyderabad510Jaipur490Chandigarh203Pune197Ahmedabad190Kolkata165Cochin147Indore136Visakhapatnam132Nagpur99Rajkot96Guwahati89Raipur75Amritsar59Surat50Patna47Ranchi45Allahabad44Agra34Dehradun30Lucknow26Jodhpur25Cuttack24Karnataka21Telangana9SC6Kerala5Jabalpur4Calcutta3Orissa3Gauhati2Rajasthan2Varanasi2Uttarakhand1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 153C5Section 153A4Section 1274Section 2633Section 153A(1)3Addition to Income3Cash Deposit3Section 143(3)2Section 682Section 153C(1)

SHRI GAURAV AGRAWAL,JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 37/JAB/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur01 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Garima Chaudhary, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 127(2)Section 132Section 153A

153A by ACIT (Central) circle Jabalpur and consequential assessment = was illegal and it should have been quashed by learned CIT(A). 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has failed to appreciate that the order passed by the Principal CIT-1, Jabalpur under section 127 of the Act is bad in law as no reason were recorded

2
Unexplained Cash Credit2
Unexplained Money2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. SHRI GAURAV AGRAWAL, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 39/JAB/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur01 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Garima Chaudhary, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 127(2)Section 132Section 153A

153A by ACIT (Central) circle Jabalpur and consequential assessment = was illegal and it should have been quashed by learned CIT(A). 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has failed to appreciate that the order passed by the Principal CIT-1, Jabalpur under section 127 of the Act is bad in law as no reason were recorded

SHRI NITIN SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 25/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Sept 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A(1)Section 153CSection 153C(1)Section 153DSection 263Section 7(1)

153A(1) r/w s. 153C in the instant case, has been made abundantly clear. The next decision cited, i.e., Vision Promoters & Builders (P.) Ltd. v. CIT [2017] 190 TTJ 398 (Chd), is again supportive of what is being stated by us, i.e., a valid basis for the jurisdiction assumed, or lack of it, is decisive of whether the assessment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. TARUN DEVCON PRIVATE LIMITED, JABALPUR

In the result, the Revenues’ appeal is dismissed in terms of the foregoing

ITA 18/JAB/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Dec 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 10(38)Section 131Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for assessment year (AY) 2015- 16 vide order dated 26.12.2017. 1 | P a g e Dy. CIT vs. Tarun Devcon (P.) Ltd. 2.1 The facts of the case in brief are that the assessee, a private limited company in the business of real estate development, having