SUNIL KUMAR PATHAK,REWA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1, , REWA
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 37/JAB/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Nov 2023AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalesunil Kumar Pathak Vs. Ito, Ward – 1, 3Rd Floor, A Block, Shilpi Rewa-486001, Plaza, Pili Kothi, Madhya Pradesh. Rewa-486001, Madhya Pradesh. Pan/Gir No. : Arwpp9628A Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri.Dhiraj Ghai.Fca.Ar Respondentby : Shri.Shiv Kumar. Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 15.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 10.11.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) / Cit(A) Passed U/Sec 144 & 250 Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:
For Appellant: Shri.Dhiraj Ghai.FCA.ARFor Respondent: Shri.Shiv Kumar. Sr.DR
Section 147Section 148
reassessment proceedings though the reasseement notice issue by the Assessing officer is defective and further the CIT(A) erred in confirming the action of the assessing is sustaining the addition overlooking the voluminous material evidences filed in the assessment and appellate proceedings. On the first issue of validity of issue of notice
U/sec148 of the Act, we find the Assessing
