Search: reassessment

5 results for “reassessment”+ Unexplained Investmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 153C5 Section 249(4)(b)4 Section 143(3)4 Section 1484 Section 2633 Section 153A(1)3 Addition to Income3 Section 249(4)(a)2 Section 153C(1)2

SMT. LALITA BAI KHANDELWAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 207/JAB/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur03 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year:2007-08 Smt. Lalita Bai Khandelwal V. Income Tax Officer Mangalwara Chouraha Ward 1 Babai, Hoshangabad

For Appellant: Shri L. L. Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. D. Chougale, D.R

Section 143(3)Section 147

unexplained investment without properly appreciating the facts of the case. At any rate the addition of Rs.9,38,500/- sustained by the learned CIT(A) is exorbitantly high and unwarranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. 6. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the appellant respectfully prays that if any addition is sustained

SMT. LALITA BAI KHANDELWAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1,

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C 2(1) , JABALPUR vs. SHRI RAKESH JAISHWAL , JABALPUR

SMT. LALITA BAI KHANDELWAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1,

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C 2(1) , JABALPUR vs. SHRI RAKESH JAISHWAL , JABALPUR

SUNIL KUMAR PATHAK,REWA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1, , REWA

VISHWANATH SINGH RATHODE,HOSHANGABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1,, ITARSI

SHRI NITIN SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, JABALPUR