BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 57clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,414Mumbai1,220Bangalore456Chennai428Jaipur351Ahmedabad279Kolkata228Hyderabad220Chandigarh168Indore115Pune111Cochin103Raipur94Visakhapatnam71Surat69Rajkot68Lucknow43Telangana43Nagpur41Karnataka41Amritsar40Dehradun37Jodhpur33Agra30Cuttack22Patna21Allahabad18Guwahati15SC13Orissa6Ranchi5Calcutta5Rajasthan4Varanasi3Jabalpur3Panaji2Uttarakhand1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(viia)9Section 37(1)6Section 43D3Deduction3Disallowance3Addition to Income3

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- SEONI, SEONI vs. JILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT, SEONI

In the result, all the Appeals and CO (# 7/2018) are allowed for statistical purposes, and CO (# 5/2018) is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 100/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri B.Ganguly, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shravan Ku. Gotru, CIT-DR
Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37(1)Section 43D

57 ITR 521 (SC), wherein again there was a conflict between the income as per the Act, and that worked with reference to the mandate of the Regulator. The issue, it may be appreciated, is not if the assessee is a banking company or not, but if a ‘cooperative bank’, separately defined under the Act, is included within ambit

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- SEONI, SEONI vs. JILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT, SEONI

In the result, all the Appeals and CO (# 7/2018) are allowed for statistical purposes, and CO (# 5/2018) is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 99/JAB/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri B.Ganguly, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shravan Ku. Gotru, CIT-DR
Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37(1)Section 43D

57 ITR 521 (SC), wherein again there was a conflict between the income as per the Act, and that worked with reference to the mandate of the Regulator. The issue, it may be appreciated, is not if the assessee is a banking company or not, but if a ‘cooperative bank’, separately defined under the Act, is included within ambit

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- SEONI, SEONI vs. JILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT, SEONI

In the result, all the Appeals and CO (# 7/2018) are allowed for statistical purposes, and CO (# 5/2018) is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 97/JAB/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Apr 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri B.Ganguly, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shravan Ku. Gotru, CIT-DR
Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37(1)Section 43D

57 ITR 521 (SC), wherein again there was a conflict between the income as per the Act, and that worked with reference to the mandate of the Regulator. The issue, it may be appreciated, is not if the assessee is a banking company or not, but if a ‘cooperative bank’, separately defined under the Act, is included within ambit