CHHAYA MASURKAR,BALAGHAT vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTER JURISDICTION OFFICER- ITO, BALAGHAT, DELHI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed
ITA 27/JAB/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 Aug 2025AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshrachhaya Masurkar V. National Faceless 1 Ward No.9 Ram Mandir Road, Assessment Centre Katangi, Madhya Pradesh- Jurisdiction Officer-Ito, 481445. Balaghat Delhi. Tan/Pan:Cakpm8662A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Vijay Bagrecha, C.A. Respondent By: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. Cit(Dr) O R D E R (1). The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Impugned Order Dated 13.02.2024 Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Hereinafter Referred As To “Cit(A)”)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Pertaining To The Assessment Year 2013-14. The Grounds Of Appeal Of The Assessee Are As Under: -
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Bagrecha, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)
Section 144Section 147Section 148
reassessment proceeding was bad in law.
The assessment order and CIT (A) order is bad in law for other reasons too.
3. On facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the assessee was not required to file the return of income as her income was below taxable limit.
4. On facts and in circumstances of the case
