BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 153A(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,009Mumbai667Chennai325Jaipur247Hyderabad243Bangalore232Ahmedabad131Chandigarh126Pune78Kolkata76Amritsar75Nagpur65Patna54Raipur52Visakhapatnam51Guwahati49Agra40Ranchi36Indore34Rajkot32Cochin26Allahabad25Lucknow24Dehradun20Cuttack20Jodhpur19Surat10Jabalpur2Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)16Section 153A2Section 12Condonation of Delay2

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IN- SITU), CENTRAL CIRCLE, JABALPUR, JABALPUR vs. MANISH KUMAR SAROGI, KATNI

Accordingly, the appeals in I.T.A.No.39/JAB/2023, 21/JAB/2019 and 62/JAB/2019 of the Revenue are dismissed for having become in-fructuous

ITA 39/JAB/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur01 Dec 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 1Section 143(2)Section 153A

153A of the Act’. The assessee in its Cross Objections, filed before us, also raised the specific ground regarding non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) of the Act. Even before us the Department has not produced any evidence to show that the notice u/s 143(2) of the Act has been actually issued. 11. The learned CIT(A) while

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE, JABALPUR vs. SHRI MANISH KUMAR SARAOGI, KATNI

Accordingly, the appeals in I.T.A.No.39/JAB/2023, 21/JAB/2019 and 62/JAB/2019 of the Revenue are dismissed for having become in-fructuous

ITA 62/JAB/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur01 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 1Section 143(2)Section 153A

153A of the Act’. The assessee in its Cross Objections, filed before us, also raised the specific ground regarding non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) of the Act. Even before us the Department has not produced any evidence to show that the notice u/s 143(2) of the Act has been actually issued. 11. The learned CIT(A) while