BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 132(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,495Mumbai2,095Bangalore711Chennai573Jaipur489Hyderabad428Ahmedabad313Kolkata278Chandigarh199Pune183Surat151Amritsar148Visakhapatnam137Indore126Cochin110Rajkot99Nagpur88Raipur88Patna80Guwahati71Agra63Lucknow46Karnataka44Cuttack41Telangana41Allahabad32Dehradun30Jodhpur29Ranchi22SC19Panaji15Orissa6Kerala6Rajasthan5Calcutta5Jabalpur4Gauhati3Uttarakhand1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 153A19Section 1327Section 158B6Section 153C5Section 153D4Section 255(4)4Section 132A4Section 2633Search & Seizure3Undisclosed Income

KALYANIKA INFRA MEGA VENTURES PVT. LTD,JABALPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) , JABALPUR

The appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 49/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 113Section 132Section 132ASection 153Section 153ASection 158BSection 255(4)

4 income, however, in case during the search no incriminating material is found, in case of completed/unabated assessment, the only remedy available to the Revenue would be to initiate the reassessment proceedings under sections 147/48 of the Act, subject to fulfilment of the conditions mentioned in sections 147/148, as in such a situation, the Revenue cannot be left with

3
Reassessment2
Block Assessment2

TARUN DEVCON PRIVATE LIMITED,JABALPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR

The appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 50/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 113Section 132Section 132ASection 153Section 153ASection 158BSection 255(4)

4 income, however, in case during the search no incriminating material is found, in case of completed/unabated assessment, the only remedy available to the Revenue would be to initiate the reassessment proceedings under sections 147/48 of the Act, subject to fulfilment of the conditions mentioned in sections 147/148, as in such a situation, the Revenue cannot be left with

SHRI TARACHAND KHATRI,JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE, JABALPUR

In the result, Ground No.1

ITA 21/JAB/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur17 Jan 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Arora

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Ved, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri H.P. Meena, D.R
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 153ASection 153D

132(4).” 5.1. The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Krishan Lal Shiv Chand Rai vs., CIT [1973] 88 ITR 293 (P&H) held that “it is an established principle of Law that a party is entitled to show and prove that an admission made by him was in fact not correct and true.” 13 ITA.No

SHRI NITIN SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 25/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Sept 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A(1)Section 153CSection 153C(1)Section 153DSection 263Section 7(1)

132(4); there being no reference thereto in the notice u/s.142(1) or the assessment order. It is also clear that the replies by the assessee to other queries have also not been examined by the AO, who has merely focused himself on verifying the two aspects of the limited scrutiny assessment. His approach, accordingly, was not correct, meriting revision