BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 119(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi555Mumbai467Chennai151Bangalore137Jaipur116Kolkata111Chandigarh99Hyderabad84Ahmedabad70Raipur63Indore61Pune57Nagpur38Guwahati36Telangana30Patna28Ranchi24Allahabad23Cuttack21Surat20Lucknow20Rajkot19Cochin18Amritsar10Karnataka8SC8Agra6Visakhapatnam6Orissa5Jodhpur4Dehradun4Jabalpur3Calcutta3Rajasthan2

Key Topics

Section 153C5Section 271(1)(c)5Section 143(3)4Section 2633Section 153A(1)3Section 153C(1)2Section 142(1)2Section 1152Reassessment2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. MADHYA PRADESH POWER GENERATING CO. LTD., JABALPUR

In the result, the Revenue's appeal is dismissed as not maintainable

ITA 251/JAB/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Feb 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Bardia, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Halder, DR
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 271(1)(c)

reassessment dated 21/3/2016, thus, had no tax impact inasmuch as the tax payable was only consequent to the deemed total income u/s. 115-JB. No penalty, even as explained in CIT v. Nalwa Sons Investment Ltd. [2010] 327 ITR 543 (Del), is leviable u/s. 271(1)(c) under such circumstances. Special Leave Petition (SLP) against the said decision has been

SHRI NITIN SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 25/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Sept 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A(1)Section 153CSection 153C(1)Section 153DSection 263Section 7(1)

b) Cash deposit, 1 | P a g e Nitin Sharma v. Pr. CIT it was not open for the ld. Pr. CIT to, in exercise of the revisionary power u/s. 263, hold that the Assessing Officer (AO) ought to have examined or inquired into other aspects of the assessee’s return of income or affairs having a bearing

VARSMA ENGINEERS GROUP,JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 224/JAB/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Oct 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Bleassessment Year: 2008-09 Varhsma Engineer’S Group, Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Income Tax, Vijay Nagar, Circle – 1(1), Jabalpur (M.P.) Jabalpur (M.P.) [Pan: Aaefv 7885Q] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. H.S. Modh Adv. Respondent By Smt. Swati Agarwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12/10/2021 Date Of Pronouncement 22/10/2021

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148(1)Section 184Section 40

reassessment proceedings as being based thereon and, thus, as not valid in law. As held by the ld. CIT(A), a deed not stamped or notarized (authenticated), is not a proper instrument of partnership. 4. I have heard the parties, and perused the material on record. 4.1 Both the parties have, in my view, travelled outside the purview