Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Short Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)6 Section 2502 Section 542 Penalty2 Addition to Income2

BASANT GROVER,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3), JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed partly for statistical purposes

ITA 93/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadalebasant Grover, Vs Ito, 245/2, Behind Ashoka Ward-2(3), Apartment, Madanmahal, Jabalpur. Jabalpur-482002 (M.P.) (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Adbpg3734F Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 13/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 20/09/2023

Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 54Section 68

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c). The capital gain since already calculated in excess with Rs. 6,13,000/-,and adding the same again u/s 68, would be taking same income twice; hence unjustified and bad in law. 5. Under the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. Rs 12,55,692 CIT(A) NFAC erred in confirming addition

BASANT GROVER,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3), JABALPUR

CHHAYA MASURKAR,BALAGHAT vs. NFAC, ITO BALAGHAT, BALAGHAT

BASANT GROVER,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3), JABALPUR

CHHAYA MASURKAR,BALAGHAT vs. NFAC, ITO BALAGHAT, BALAGHAT