BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 272A(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Indore47Chennai44Mumbai32Surat28Cuttack16Bangalore14Jaipur10Kolkata6Visakhapatnam6Rajkot6Delhi4Jabalpur3Chandigarh3Pune3Ahmedabad2Nagpur2Allahabad2Raipur2Guwahati1Cochin1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 272A(1)(d)8Section 1445Cash Deposit3Penalty3Addition to Income3Section 2502Section 271A2

AMIT KUMAR YADAV,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SEONI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 166/JAB/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. G.N. Purohit, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 250Section 271ASection 272A(1)(d)

E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. These three appeals have been filed by the assessee, against the various orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 passed separately on 29.08.2024, dismissing the appeals of the assessee against the assessment order passed under section 144 on 27.04.2021, the order under section 272A

AMIT KUMAR YADAV,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SEONI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 168/JAB/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. G.N. Purohit, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 250Section 271ASection 272A(1)(d)

E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. These three appeals have been filed by the assessee, against the various orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 passed separately on 29.08.2024, dismissing the appeals of the assessee against the assessment order passed under section 144 on 27.04.2021, the order under section 272A

VIVEK KUMAR SINGH,REWA vs. ITO WARD SINGRAULI, SINGRAULI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 54/JAB/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur18 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalevivek Kumar Singh, Vs. Ito, 14/357, Sanjay Nagar Singrauli, Rewa-486001, Madhya Pradesh. Madhya Pradesh.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Shiv Kumar. Sr.DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 2Section 272ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 274(2)Section 3

E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) / CIT(A) passed u/s 272A(1)(d) and 250 of the Act. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: The Ld. CIT (A) has erred in confirming the penalty levied u/s 272A(1)(d) without