Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 139(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)7 Section 142(1)6 Section 132(1)4 Section 131(1)(d)4 Section 271F4 Search & Seizure4 Section 1473 Penalty3 Section 271(1)(b)

SURAJ SINGH,SIDHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, REWA

In the result, both the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 60/JAB/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur16 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148(1)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)Section 271F

139(1), but section 148(1) is a para materia provision, casting, like-wise, an obligation to file the return of income, which is rather more compelling inasmuch as in such a case the Revenue has a reason to believe that the assessee’s income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. No wonder, then, that the AO refers to both

SURAJ SINGH,SIDHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, REWA

SURAJ SINGH,SIDHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, REWA

SURAJ SINGH,SIDHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, REWA

JITENDRA PRATAP SINGH BAGRI,SATNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD , , SATNA

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. M/S SHOBHA MINERALS (DHAMKI), JABALPUR

M/S SHOBHA MINERALS (DHAMKI),JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL CIRCLE, JABALPUR

M/S SHOBHA MINERALS (KEVLARI),JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL CIRCLE, JABALPUR

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. M/S SHOBHA MINERALS (KEVLARI), JABALPUR