BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “house property”+ Section 166clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi504Karnataka452Mumbai344Bangalore116Jaipur80Chandigarh77Cochin61Chennai52Telangana47Kolkata42Hyderabad41Ahmedabad39Raipur35Lucknow28Pune20Amritsar16Calcutta16Visakhapatnam15Nagpur13Indore11Rajasthan9Rajkot8SC8Patna7Surat6Jabalpur5Agra4Varanasi4Cuttack3Orissa2Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 2638Section 263(2)4Limitation/Time-bar4Revision u/s 2634Section 271D3Section 269S2

SURESH UPADHYAY AND SONS,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(5),

In the result, the appeals by the assessee‟s are dismissed

ITA 19/JAB/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur08 Apr 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Shri U.B. Mishra , CIT-DR
Section 263Section 263(2)

House No.1806, Purani Basti, Ward-2(5), Jabalpur. A Temerbhita Kajarwara, p Jabalpur. [PAN: AAKPU 3939 N] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Dhiraj Ghai, FCA Respondent by : Shri U.B. Mishra , CIT-DR Date of hearing : 08/04/2022 Date of pronouncement : 01/07/2022 ORDER Per Bench This is a set of four Appeals by two different, albeit related, assessees, agitating the order/s under

SURESH UPADHYAY AND SONS,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(5),

In the result, the appeals by the assessee‟s are dismissed

ITA 20/JAB/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur08 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Shri U.B. Mishra , CIT-DR
Section 263Section 263(2)

House No.1806, Purani Basti, Ward-2(5), Jabalpur. A Temerbhita Kajarwara, p Jabalpur. [PAN: AAKPU 3939 N] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Dhiraj Ghai, FCA Respondent by : Shri U.B. Mishra , CIT-DR Date of hearing : 08/04/2022 Date of pronouncement : 01/07/2022 ORDER Per Bench This is a set of four Appeals by two different, albeit related, assessees, agitating the order/s under

SURESH UPADHYAY AND SONS,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(5),

In the result, the appeals by the assessee‟s are dismissed

ITA 21/JAB/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur08 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Shri U.B. Mishra , CIT-DR
Section 263Section 263(2)

House No.1806, Purani Basti, Ward-2(5), Jabalpur. A Temerbhita Kajarwara, p Jabalpur. [PAN: AAKPU 3939 N] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Dhiraj Ghai, FCA Respondent by : Shri U.B. Mishra , CIT-DR Date of hearing : 08/04/2022 Date of pronouncement : 01/07/2022 ORDER Per Bench This is a set of four Appeals by two different, albeit related, assessees, agitating the order/s under

SMT. ANURADHA UPADHYAY,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(5),

In the result, the appeals by the assessee‟s are dismissed

ITA 22/JAB/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur08 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Shri U.B. Mishra , CIT-DR
Section 263Section 263(2)

House No.1806, Purani Basti, Ward-2(5), Jabalpur. A Temerbhita Kajarwara, p Jabalpur. [PAN: AAKPU 3939 N] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Dhiraj Ghai, FCA Respondent by : Shri U.B. Mishra , CIT-DR Date of hearing : 08/04/2022 Date of pronouncement : 01/07/2022 ORDER Per Bench This is a set of four Appeals by two different, albeit related, assessees, agitating the order/s under

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SATNA vs. SHRI JAMMU BEG,

In the result, the levy of penalty is cancelled and the appeal of the appellant is allowed

ITA 196/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: FixedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleacit, Vs. Shri Jammu Beg, Satna, M/S Mirza Transport, Madhya Pradesh. Main Road, Waidhan, Singrauli. Madhya Pradesh.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271D

house. In normal course, the exigency in making cash payments for such expenses cannot be ruled out Where the explanation of the assessee that violation of provisions of s. 269SS was due to certain bona fide belief of the assessee is found to be acceptable, penalty under s 27D is untenable. [CIT vs. Saini Medical Store