Search: disallowance

8 results for “disallowance”+ Unexplained Investmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26310 Section 143(3)7 Addition to Income7 Section 1476 Section 1444 Section 1484 Section 143(2)3 Section 683 Natural Justice3 Section 142(1)

RENU ANANDANI,JABALPUR vs. NFAC, NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 120/JAB/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Neeraj Agarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

disallowed but the entire investment of Rs. 28,89,600/-. Therefore, he added back the balance of Rs. 7,16,972/- in the hands of the assessee as unexplained

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 1 (1), JABALPUR vs. M/S. RAJLUXMI ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., NARSHINGPUR

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is disposed of on the above terms

RENU ANANDANI,JABALPUR vs. NFAC, NFAC, DELHI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 1 (1), JABALPUR vs. M/S. RAJLUXMI ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., NARSHINGPUR

RENU ANANDANI,JABALPUR vs. NFAC, NFAC, DELHI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 1 (1), JABALPUR vs. M/S. RAJLUXMI ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., NARSHINGPUR

KHANNA AUTOMOBILES REWA,REWA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, REWA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) , JABALPUR vs. M/S. JABALPUR HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER, JABALPUR

SANJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL ,SATNA vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE, SATNA

INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 1(1), JABALPUR vs. SHRI DEEPAK SINGH BANAFER, JABALPUR

M/S.ASIT DIXIT,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD2(2), JABALPUR

M/S AMBAJEE JEWELLERS JABALPUR,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JABALPUR-1,, JABALPUR