JILA SAHAKARI BANK MARYDIT,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD1(2),
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 231/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur16 Mar 2018AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad""./ Ita No. 231/Jab/2016 "" " " " " " " / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Jila Sahakari Bank Maryadit, Income Tax Officer, Sahakari Sadan, Wright Town, Vs Ward 1(2), Jabalpur (Mp) Jabalpur Pan : Aaajj 0118 J / (Appellant) / (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Neeraj Agrawal, Ca Revenue By : Shri Pd Chougule, Dr $ %&'/Date Of Hearing : 15/03/2018 ! "# $ %&' /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/03/2018 ()*+ "# .//O R D E R , - Per Manish Borad:- This Appeal Of Assessee For Assessment Year 2012-13 Is Directed Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-I, Jabalpur Dated 9Th June 2016 Vide Appeal No.J/Cit/A/I/Jbp/Ito/Ward/1(3)/Jbp/079/2015-16, Arising Out Of Order Under Section 144/143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) Dated 27.03.2015 Framed By The Ito, Ward 1(2), Jabalpur.
For Appellant: Shri Neeraj Agrawal, CAFor Respondent: Shri PD Chougule, DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 36(1)(viia)Section 40
loss, on the presumption that same amount is claimed as provision for bad and doubtful debts. However amount was bad debts was erroneously stated at Rs.3,98,33,209/- instead of Rs. 3,05,30,820/-. Hence the order is bad in law.
4. The learned CIT(Appeal) wrongly concluded that the addition of Rs.800000/- on account of non deduction
