M/S SHOBHA MINERALS (DHAMKI),JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL CIRCLE, JABALPUR
In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed and the Revenue’s appeals are dismissed
ITA 52/JAB/2018[2015-16 (Quarter: 2)]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Feb 2020
Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Aroraassessment Year:2015-16 M/S. Shobha Minerals (Kevlari) Vs. Asst. Cit, 765 Near Anand Talkies, Central Circle, Napier Town, Jabalpur Jabalpur [Pan: Abifs 4245A] Assessment Year:2015-16 Asst. Cit(Central), Vs. M/S. Shobha Minerals (Kevlari) Jabalpur 765 Near Anand Talkies, Napier Town, Jabalpur [Pan: Abifs 4245A] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year:2015-16 M/S. Shobha Minerals (Dhamki) Vs. Asst. Cit, 765 Near Anand Talkies, Central Circle, Napier Town, Jabalpur Jabalpur [Pan: Abmfs5899N] Assessment Year:2015-16 Asst. Cit(Central), Vs. M/S. Shobha Minerals (Dhamki) Jabalpur 765 Near Anand Talkies, Napier Town, Jabalpur [Pan: Abmfs 5899N] (Appellant) (Respondent)
Section 131(1)(d)Section 132(1)Section 143(3)
1, i.e., in terms of the Mining Plan itself, while it is only at 500 MT (i.e., as against an iron ore production of 66,000
MT). The production (of iron ore) is saleable, and which position, besides being borne out by the record, agrees with the assessee’s case of iron ore being saleable in the grade class