BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 40A(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,451Mumbai1,389Chennai637Kolkata572Bangalore530Ahmedabad216Pune185Hyderabad160Jaipur145Raipur126Surat115Indore93Amritsar86Chandigarh70Visakhapatnam51Cuttack50Nagpur49Rajkot46Lucknow37Cochin34Karnataka26Agra24Allahabad24Jodhpur21Guwahati16Patna15Dehradun13SC12Varanasi9Calcutta6Ranchi5Jabalpur3Panaji2Punjab & Haryana2Kerala2Telangana1Rajasthan1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)6Section 2503Section 1443Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 402Section 143(3)2TDS2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 104/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

7 of the Revenue is dismissed. 33. Ground No. 8 is regarding deleting the addition of Rs.1,81,712/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of disallowance of expenditure claimed by the assessee. 34. The assessee claimed labour charges expenses of Rs.11,74,914/- and mines expenses of Rs.24,59,316/-. The Assessing Officer made disallowance

LATE SHRI TIRATH RAJ SINGH,THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SHRI GYANENDRA SINGH, VIDEH NIKUNJ, NEAR JAWAHAR PARK, SIDHI(M.P),SIDHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -2, , REWA

ITA 52/JAB/2023[2008-09]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jabalpur
21 Jul 2023
AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2008-09 Late Shri Tirath Raj Singh, Vs. Income Tax Officer-2, Through Legal Heir Shri Rewa (Mp) Gyanendra Singh, Videh Nikunj, Jawahar Park, Sidhi (Mp) Pan : Ajkps7948G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri H.S. Modh, Advocate Respondent By Shri Ravi Mehrotra, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 10/07/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21/07/2023

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40A(3)

Section 40A(3) of the Act. 7. We have heard the rival submissions and have also perused the material on record. At this juncture, it will be appropriate to reproduce the relevant portion from the assessment order which deals with the issue at hand. The same is being reproduced hereinunder: “From the verification of Cement Account it is noticed that

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 194CSection 234BSection 234DSection 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 40

disallowance of the said 3 A.Y. 2017-18 Krishna Construction Company expenses under section 40a(ia) of the Income Tax Act and initiated penalty proceedings under section 270A. The ld. AO also noted that the assessee had shown receipt of Rs.20,38,532/- from Executive Engineer, Bansagar, Keoti Canal Division, Rewa, but as per 26AS, the assessee was seen