Search: disallowance

1 result for “disallowance”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai50 Delhi41 Chennai36 Bangalore32 Kolkata20 Indore19 Jaipur16 Hyderabad14 Ahmedabad11 Agra9 Pune7 Panaji6 Surat6 Cochin5 Visakhapatnam3 Chandigarh2 Raipur2 SC1 Lucknow1 Jabalpur1 Rajkot1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 271D3 Section 269S2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SATNA vs. SHRI JAMMU BEG,

In the result, the levy of penalty is cancelled and the appeal of the appellant is allowed

ITA 196/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: FixedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleacit, Vs. Shri Jammu Beg, Satna, M/S Mirza Transport, Madhya Pradesh. Main Road, Waidhan, Singrauli. Madhya Pradesh.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT-DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271D

disallowed the accounting charges paid u/s 40(a)(ia) and added entire amount u/s 68 and imposed penalty under Sections 271Dand 271E. The tribunal deleted penalty imposed by AO. The High Court held that loans taken were genuine and same was for business Jammu Beg. exigency. It was not case of undisclosed income. Reasonable cause for not levying penalty existed