BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 234Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore108Raipur8Mumbai6Jaipur5Chennai4Jabalpur3Bangalore3Delhi3Kolkata2Lucknow2Ahmedabad2Jodhpur1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 200A33Section 234E33Section 231E3Section 200C3Section 234A3Penalty3TDS3

POORAN LAL VISHWAKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 87/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

234E is set aside and fee levied is deleted. However, the other adjustment made by the Assessing Officer in the impugned intimation shall stand as such.” 6. The Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. M/s Essar Teleholding Ltd. (2018) 3 SCC 253 certain occasion to consider the applicability of missionary provision. In other words, when the Parliament introduced

SHRI SHANKARLAL VISHWKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC- TDS , GHAZIABAB

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 88/JAB/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

234E is set aside and fee levied is deleted. However, the other adjustment made by the Assessing Officer in the impugned intimation shall stand as such.” 6. The Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. M/s Essar Teleholding Ltd. (2018) 3 SCC 253 certain occasion to consider the applicability of missionary provision. In other words, when the Parliament introduced

SHRI SHANKARLAL VISHWKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC- TDS , GHAZIABAB

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 89/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

234E is set aside and fee levied is deleted. However, the other adjustment made by the Assessing Officer in the impugned intimation shall stand as such.” 6. The Apex Court in the case of CIT vs. M/s Essar Teleholding Ltd. (2018) 3 SCC 253 certain occasion to consider the applicability of missionary provision. In other words, when the Parliament introduced