BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 234Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,256Delhi866Bangalore582Ahmedabad202Kolkata159Chennai116Jaipur107Hyderabad83Pune74Nagpur50Indore45Rajkot32Raipur30Allahabad28Lucknow22Surat21Chandigarh21Agra18Karnataka14Jodhpur9Dehradun9Visakhapatnam8Amritsar7Patna4SC3Cochin2Cuttack2Jabalpur2Telangana2Ranchi1Punjab & Haryana1Panaji1Guwahati1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 43B6Section 234A4Addition to Income2

M/S RPJ MINERALS PVT. LTD ,MAIHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1,SATNA, SATNA

ITA 86/JAB/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur19 Sept 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nNoneFor Respondent: \nSh. Shrawan Kumar Meena, CIT DR
Section 234ASection 43B

234C of\nI.T. Act 1961, Without prejudice, levy of interest under section 234A, 234B and\n234C of I.T. Act 1961 is unjustified, unwarranted and excessive.\n8. Any other ground that shall be prayed at the time of hearing.\"\n2\nITA No.154/JAB/2016\nITA No.86/JAB/2022\nA.Ys. 2012-13 & 2017-18\nM/s RPJ Minerals Pvt. Ltd.\n2.\nWe may take

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 vs. M/S RPJ MINERALS PRIVATE LTD., SATNA

In the result, ITA No.154/JAB/2016 is held to be allowed for statistical\npurposes while ITA No

ITA 154/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur
19 Sept 2025
AY 2012-13
For Appellant: \nNoneFor Respondent: \nSh. Shrawan Kumar Meena, CIT DR
Section 234ASection 43B

234C of\nI.T. Act 1961, Without prejudice, levy of interest under section 234A, 234B and\n234C of I.T. Act 1961 is unjustified, unwarranted and excessive.\n8. Any other ground that shall be prayed at the time of hearing.\"\n2. We may take up ITA No. 154/JAB/2016 in the first instance. The facts of the\ncase are that the assessee