BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 200Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi7Jabalpur3Nagpur3

Key Topics

Section 200A33Section 234E33Section 231E3Section 200C3Section 234A3Penalty3TDS3

POORAN LAL VISHWAKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 87/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

200C is a missionary provision, therefore, it is applicable retrospectively. When the adjustment made while processing the return by levy of fee u/s. 234E is very much valid. The ld. Departmental Representative has also placed reliance on the judgment of the Madras High Court in ‘Qatalys Software Technologies Ltd. vs. Union of India’ (2020) 115 Taxman.com 345 and submitted that

SHRI SHANKARLAL VISHWKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC- TDS , GHAZIABAB

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 88/JAB/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

200C is a missionary provision, therefore, it is applicable retrospectively. When the adjustment made while processing the return by levy of fee u/s. 234E is very much valid. The ld. Departmental Representative has also placed reliance on the judgment of the Madras High Court in ‘Qatalys Software Technologies Ltd. vs. Union of India’ (2020) 115 Taxman.com 345 and submitted that

SHRI SHANKARLAL VISHWKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC- TDS , GHAZIABAB

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 89/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

200C is a missionary provision, therefore, it is applicable retrospectively. When the adjustment made while processing the return by levy of fee u/s. 234E is very much valid. The ld. Departmental Representative has also placed reliance on the judgment of the Madras High Court in ‘Qatalys Software Technologies Ltd. vs. Union of India’ (2020) 115 Taxman.com 345 and submitted that