BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 172clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,114Delhi840Bangalore258Chennai221Kolkata166Jaipur150Surat114Hyderabad100Ahmedabad90Cochin67Raipur47Calcutta35Indore33Pune31Allahabad29Chandigarh27Cuttack24Nagpur21Lucknow20Telangana20Karnataka18Rajkot15Ranchi15Guwahati13Agra10SC7Visakhapatnam6Amritsar6Jodhpur6Jabalpur4Dehradun4Kerala1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Varanasi1Rajasthan1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 80P10Section 1488Section 43B6Section 234A4Section 1474Addition to Income4Section 2502Section 143(2)2Deduction2TDS

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, all the three appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 149/JAB/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, Advocate & ShFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80P

disallowance in the year under consideration is bad in law. ADDITIONAL GROUND 5. The AO was not justified in passing order under section 147 of the Act without issuing any notice under section 148 as the notice issued under section 148 was not issued to anybody as apparent from the portal. 6. The AO was not justified in passing order

2
Disallowance2
Limitation/Time-bar2

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, all the three appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 151/JAB/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, Advocate & ShFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80P

disallowance in the year under consideration is bad in law. ADDITIONAL GROUND 5. The AO was not justified in passing order under section 147 of the Act without issuing any notice under section 148 as the notice issued under section 148 was not issued to anybody as apparent from the portal. 6. The AO was not justified in passing order

M/S RPJ MINERALS PVT. LTD ,MAIHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1,SATNA, SATNA

ITA 86/JAB/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur19 Sept 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nNoneFor Respondent: \nSh. Shrawan Kumar Meena, CIT DR
Section 234ASection 43B

172 (SC). The assessee once again\nsubmitted that the deposits continued to form part of the funds required for the\nimplementation of the project. They were not spare or surplus funds. The purpose of\nmaking the short term deposits was to make efficient use of the project capital and\nthereby to reduce the cost of the project to the extent

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 vs. M/S RPJ MINERALS PRIVATE LTD., SATNA

In the result, ITA No.154/JAB/2016 is held to be allowed for statistical\npurposes while ITA No

ITA 154/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur19 Sept 2025AY 2012-13
For Appellant: \nNoneFor Respondent: \nSh. Shrawan Kumar Meena, CIT DR
Section 234ASection 43B

172 (SC). The assessee once again\nsubmitted that the deposits continued to form part of the funds required for the\nimplementation of the project. They were not spare or surplus funds. The purpose of\nmaking the short term deposits was to make efficient use of the project capital and\nthereby to reduce the cost of the project to the extent