ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-KATNI vs. SMT.NIRMALA PATHAK, KATNI

In the result, both the appeal of the revenue and C

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesan & Sanjay Aroraassessment Year 2014-15

penny stock company therefore, the CIT(A) ought not to have allowed the claim of the assessee. On a query from the bench how the second ground of appeal with regard to 50,30,000/- on account of unexplained investment arises for consideration when no such addition was made by the Assessing Officer, the ld. DR submitted that the source