BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Deemed Dividendclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,166Delhi1,211Chennai559Kolkata496Bangalore417Ahmedabad322Pune212Cochin148Hyderabad141Chandigarh128Jaipur128Raipur116Visakhapatnam58Indore50Lucknow43Surat42Amritsar35Cuttack31Karnataka29Guwahati23Nagpur19SC18Panaji17Agra15Rajkot9Telangana8Jodhpur6Jabalpur6Ranchi4Punjab & Haryana3Dehradun3Calcutta3Varanasi3Orissa2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)5Disallowance5Addition to Income5Section 80P(1)4Section 143(3)3Section 14A3TDS3Section 1152Section 80P(2)(a)2Section 80

VISHAL DATT,JABLPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 78/JAB/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Seth, CAFor Respondent: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)

disallowance of interest made by AO may kindly be deleted. Against the order assessee made an appeal before the CIT ( A ) but the notice of hearing were not received by the assessee as the notice were sent in the email id. VISHALDATT@ YAHOO.COM but this email i.d. was not used by the assessee since long time as there was fraud

VISHAL DATT,JABALPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1) , JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 79/JAB/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 May 2025AY 2018-19

Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudhary

2
Bench:
For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Seth, CAFor Respondent: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)

disallowance of interest made by AO may kindly be deleted. Against the order assessee made an appeal before the CIT ( A ) but the notice of hearing were not received by the assessee as the notice were sent in the email id. VISHALDATT@YAHOO.COM but this email i.d. was not used by the assessee since long time re was fraud done

VISHAL DATT,JABALPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 77/JAB/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Seth, CAFor Respondent: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)

disallowance of interest made by AO may kindly be deleted. Against the order assessee made an appeal before the CIT ( A ) but the notice of hearing were not received by the assessee as the notice were sent in the email id. VISHALDATT@ YAHOO.COM but this email i.d. was not used by the assessee since long time as there was fraud

RASHMEET SINGH MALHOTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1,

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed

ITA 226/JAB/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. K.P Dewani, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Ravi Mehrotra, JCIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 48

dividend income which is exempt of Rs. 1.4 lakhs. The Assessing Officer disallowed of Rs. 3.79 lakhs out of which of Rs. 2.63 lakhs was on account of interest. The assessee is having own capital of Rs. 76.52 lakhs and interest free unsecured loans of Rs. 159.50 lakhs and has not paid any interest on account of the investment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. MADHYA PRADESH POWER GENERATING CO. LTD., JABALPUR

In the result, the Revenue's appeal is dismissed as not maintainable

ITA 251/JAB/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Feb 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Bardia, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Halder, DR
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 271(1)(c)

deems concealment of particulars of income where the conditions set out in clause (A) or clause (B) of the said Explanation 1 are not met. The assessee stating of prior period expenses being not liable to be disallowed inasmuch as prior period income had been assessed for the current year, overlooks the fact that the expenditure can be allowed only

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, CHHINDWARA vs. M. P. RASTRIYA KOYLA KHADAN MAJDOOR SANGH COLLIERY EMPLOYEE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, CHHINDWARA

ITA 4/JAB/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Jan 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‘Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Sh. G.N. Purohit, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Smt. Maya Maheshwari & Sh
Section 143(3)Section 44Section 5Section 80Section 80P(1)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance, since deleted in first appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jabalpur (‗CIT(A)‘, for short) vide his order dated 08/07/2020 in respect of the assessee‘s assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‗the Act‘ hereinafter), dated 12/12/2019 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18. 2. The appeal raises the following grounds