Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

165 results for “disallowance”

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai27,434 Delhi19,712 Chennai8,309 Kolkata7,626 Bangalore6,656 Ahmedabad5,049 Pune4,721 Hyderabad3,287 Jaipur2,489 Cochin1,760 Chandigarh1,754 Surat1,501 Indore1,423 Visakhapatnam1,067 Cuttack949 Raipur875 Karnataka815 Rajkot735 Amritsar726 Nagpur723 Lucknow571 Panaji375 Agra352 Jodhpur343 Ranchi317 Guwahati295 Telangana238 Patna232 Calcutta219 Dehradun201 Jabalpur165 SC158 Allahabad149 Kerala83 Varanasi68 Punjab & Haryana47 Orissa24 Rajasthan12 Himachal Pradesh8 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN7 Gauhati2 Andhra Pradesh2 Uttarakhand2 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1 RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1 J&K1 Tripura1 D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1 Bombay1 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Addition to Income78 Disallowance64 Section 143(3)61 Section 143(1)50 Section 36(1)(va)47 Section 26344 Section 43B38 Section 4037 Deduction34 Section 154

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 104/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

disallowance of Rs.5,99,129/- made by the AO on account of disallowance of telephone and mobile expenses incurred. 6. On the facts

MOHAN LAL HARGOVIND DAS BIDI UYDUOG PRIVATE LIMITED ,JABALPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 165 · Page 1 of 9

...

28

Section 37(1)24

ITA 1/JAB/2023[2014-15]Status: Disposed

ITAT Jabalpur

18 Aug 2023

AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143(3)

disallowances made under the heads messing expenses, office expenses and freight inward expenses. The Assessing Officer made disallowances amounting to Rs.4

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-KATNI, KATNI vs. M/S. GAJRAJ MINING PVT. L:TD., SINGRAULI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as assessee is dismissed

ITA 27/JAB/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT(DR)

Section 2Section 36(1)(iii)Section 43B

disallowance on account of interest is called for. Order of the ld. CIT(A) on this grounds is affirmed. Disallowance

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) , JABALPUR vs. M/S.TIRUPATI CONSTRUCTION (PAN AACFT8104E), OPP. RAILWAY STATION, BURHAR, DIST.- SHAHDOL (M.P.)

In the result, issue no.3 raised by the Revenue in ground no

ITA 25/JAB/2017[A.Y- 2012-13,]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur16 Mar 2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad""./ Ita No. 25/Jab/2017 "" " " " " " " / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Asstt. Commissioner Of M/S. Tirupati Construction, Income-Tax, Vs Opp. Railway Station, Burhar, Central Circle Distt. – Shahdol (Mp) Jabalpur Pan : Aacft 8104 E / (Appellant) / (Respondent) Revenue By : Shri V.B. Sargar, Dr Assessee By : Shri B.K. Nema, Adv. $ %&'/Date Of Hearing : 15/03/2018 ! "# $ %&' /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/03/2018 ()*+ "# .//O R D E R , - Per Manish Borad:- This Appeal Of Revenue For Assessment Year 2012-13 Is Directed Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-2, Jabalpur Dated 14.03.2017 Vide Appeal No.J/Cit(A)2/Jbp/Acit/Cir/Katni/024/2015-16, Arising Out Of Order Under Section 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) Dated 17.03.2015 Framed By The Acit, Circle-Katni.

For Appellant: Shri B.K. Nema, AdvFor Respondent: Shri V.B. Sargar, DR

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 14A

disallowance of interest, Rs.1,13,425/- for disallowance of 0.5% of exempt investment and deletion of disallowance of expenses of Rs.33

SUDHIR CHANDRA DATT,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 58/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalesudhir Chandra Datt, Vs. Ito, Circle – 2(1), 1148A, Napier Town, Aaykar Bhavan, Jabalpur-482001, Napier Town, Madhyapradesh. Jabalpur-482001, Madhyapradesh. Pan/Gir No. : Acspd5225E Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri.Sanjayseth.Ca & Shri.Sachinbajpai,Adv.Ar Respondentby : Shri.Shivkumar.Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 18.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21.09.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Orders Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi / Cit(A) & Passed The Order U/Sec 143(3) & 250 Of The Act.

For Appellant: Shri.SanjaySeth.CA &For Respondent: Shri.ShivKumar.Sr. DR

disallowance of salary &wages of Wine business @5%(ii) disallowance of salary & wages of construction business @2% and (iii) disallowance

PHOENIX POULTRY,JABALPUR,JABALPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(1),JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 76/JAB/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalephoenix Poultry, Vs. Acit, Circle -1(1) 201, Ratan Colony, Jabalpur, Gorakhpur, Madhya Pradesh. Jabalpur- 482001. Madhya Pradesh. Pan/Gir No. : Aajfp5811H Appellant .. Respondent Assessee By : Shri Dhiraj Ghai, Ca Respondentby : Shri, Shiv Kumar. Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 20.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21.09.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi / Cit(A) Passed U/S 143(1)And 250 Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj Ghai, CAFor Respondent: Shri, Shiv Kumar. Sr.DR

Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) of the Act of Rs. 9,03,280/- being employees contribution towards PF and ESI not paid

HAJARIMAL MISHRIMAL BAFANA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE,

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for AY 2004-05 is dismissed, and that of AY 2005-06 is partly allowed

ITA 176/JAB/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Nov 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Mehrotra Sr. DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 254(2)Section 43B

disallowance of which, at Rs. 8,50,261, stands confirmed in full in first appeal. The amount disallowed is in view

HARSHU CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE1(1), JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 199/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Aroraassessment Year: 2014-15 Harshu Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Income 903, M.H. House, Gole Bazar, Tax, Circle 1(1), Jabalpur- 482002 Jabalpur [Pan: Aabch 9808B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143Section 37(1)

disallowance, in law and in the facts and circumstances of the case, of a sum of Rs.3,86,775, being

J.P TOBACCO PRODUCT PVT. LTD.,DAMOH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, SAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 155/JAB/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadalem/S. J.P.Tobacco Products Vs Acit, Pvt. Ltd., Patharia Phatak, Circle-Sagar. Damoh (M.P.). (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacj7141G Assessee By Shri G.N.Purohit, Sr.Adv. & Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, Adv. Revenue By Shri Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 15/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2023

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 37

disallowance. In view of the disallowance upheld by the Tribunal, the AO issued show cause notice for levy of penalty

SANJAY KALE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 234/JAB/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur16 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad""./ Ita No. 234/Jab/2015 "" " " " " " " / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Sanjay Kale, Income Tax Officer-1, Vishnu Nagar, Parasia Road, Vs Chhindwara (Mp) Chhindwara (Mp) Pan : Amcpk 1268 L / (Appellant) / (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri G.N. Purohit, Sr. Adv. Revenue By : Shri P.D. Chougule, Dr $ %&'/Date Of Hearing : 14/03/2018 ! "# $ %&' /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/03/2018 ()*+ "# .//O R D E R , - Per Manish Borad:- This Appeal Of Assessee For Assessment Year 2008-09 Is Directed Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-I, Jabalpur Dated 22.09.2015 Vide Appeal No.J/Cit/A/I/Jbp/Ito/W/I/Cwa/203/10-11, Arising Out Of Order Under Section 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”), Framed On 24.12.2010 By The Ito-1, Chhindwara.

For Appellant: Shri G.N. Purohit, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri P.D. Chougule, DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 251(4)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 44A

disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) at Rs.11,15,549/-. Learned CIT(A), while adjudicating this issue, deleted the disallowance

M/S ANUSHREE ENGINEERING,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JABALPUR

In the result, subject to the caveat stated at para 3

ITA 153/JAB/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur27 Sept 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271(1)(c)

disallowances, i.e., other than of the conveyance expenditure, and are therefore directed to be deleted. As regards the disallowance of conveyance

M/S.ANUSHRI ENGINEERING,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, subject to the caveat stated at para 3

ITA 6/JAB/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur27 Sept 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271(1)(c)

disallowances, i.e., other than of the conveyance expenditure, and are therefore directed to be deleted. As regards the disallowance of conveyance

M/S GEOMIN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 31/JAB/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur07 Sept 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

disallowance, and the assessee succeeds. We decide accordingly. 4. The next issue is, similarly, qua a disallowance for Rs.50,000 out of expenditure

SANJAY RATHI,CHHINDWARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, CHHINDWARA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 212/JAB/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur14 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad""./ Ita No. 212/Jab/2015 "" " " " " " " / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Sanjay Rathi, Income Tax Officer, Prop. Of M/S. Rathi Industries, Vs Chindwara-1, Sausar, Chhindwara (Mp) Chindwara (Mp) Pan : Acppr 7820 Q / (Appellant) / (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri G.N. Purohit, Sr. Adv. Revenue By : Shri. P.D. Chougule, Dr $ %&'/Date Of Hearing : 12/03/2018 ! "# $ %&' /Date Of Pronouncement: 14/03/2018 ()*+ "# .//O R D E R , - Per Manish Borad:- This Appeal Of Assessee Pertaining To Assessment Year 2010-11 Is Directed Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-I, Jabalpur Dated 11.08.2015 Vide Appeal No.J/Cit/A/I/Ito/W.1/Cwa/039/13-14, Arising Out Of Order Under Section 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) Dated 11.03.2013 Framed By The Ito-1, Chhindwara.

For Appellant: Shri G.N. Purohit, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri. P.D. Chougule, DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

disallowance of 10% out of vehicle expenses and depreciation. The disallowance of expenses is unwarranted and without any basis. The same

RAI SAHAB BHAIYALAL DUBEY EDUCATIONAL AND MEDICAL CHARITABLE TRUST,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 186/JAB/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur10 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 11ASection 12ASection 143(1)

disallowances were being made under section 143(1) of the Act, and similar disallowance is also made for the present

VISHAL DATT,JABLPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 78/JAB/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Seth, CAFor Respondent: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)

disallowance of labour payments in Datt Enterprise account. Assessee had debited 1,35,86,570/- as labour wages and 20,66,976/- as ‘leveling

VISHAL DATT,JABALPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 77/JAB/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Seth, CAFor Respondent: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)

disallowance of labour payments in Datt Enterprise account. Assessee had debited 1,35,86,570/- as labour wages and 20,66,976/- as ‘leveling

VISHAL DATT,JABALPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1) , JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 79/JAB/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Seth, CAFor Respondent: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)

disallowance of labour payments in Datt Enterprise account. Assessee had debited 1,35,86,570/- as labour wages and 20,66,976/- as 'leveling

M/S.SAGAR TOBACCO & INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD.,SAGAR vs. ASSISTANCE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1), JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 48/JAB/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur08 Jul 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Abhijeet Srivastava, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Mehrotra, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 194Section 40

disallowance for Rs. 1,43,903 u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act in view of the non-deduction of tax at source

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- SEONI, SEONI vs. JILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT, SEONI

In the result, all the Appeals and CO (# 7/2018) are allowed for statistical purposes, and CO (# 5/2018) is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 97/JAB/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Apr 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri B.Ganguly, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shravan Ku. Gotru, CIT-DR

Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37(1)Section 43D

disallowed the provision for bad and doubtful debts to the extent it related to standard assets. Inasmuch as the corresponding