BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Unexplained Investmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai493Delhi317Jaipur131Chennai120Bangalore118Ahmedabad106Kolkata76Hyderabad70Pune62Chandigarh54Indore43Nagpur27Raipur27Cochin26Visakhapatnam24Surat24Guwahati20Lucknow16Rajkot11Cuttack11Amritsar10Jodhpur9Agra9Varanasi7Allahabad6Ranchi5Telangana5SC3Karnataka3Jabalpur3Patna3Dehradun2

Key Topics

Addition to Income3Section 143(3)2Unexplained Investment2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 1 (1), JABALPUR vs. M/S. RAJLUXMI ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., NARSHINGPUR

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is disposed of on the above terms

ITA 80/JAB/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur14 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Bardia, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Mehrotra, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 32Section 32(1)

depreciation (u/s. 32(1)) for the current year, which may be disallowed. In view of the AO, it was, however, a case of unexplained increase in fixed assets, and who therefore added the entire amount of difference as unexplained investment

SMT. LALITA BAI KHANDELWAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 207/JAB/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur03 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year:2007-08 Smt. Lalita Bai Khandelwal V. Income Tax Officer Mangalwara Chouraha Ward 1 Babai, Hoshangabad

For Appellant: Shri L. L. Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. D. Chougale, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 147

unexplained investment without properly appreciating the facts of the case. At any rate the addition of Rs.9,38,500/- sustained by the learned CIT(A) is exorbitantly high and unwarranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. 6. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the appellant respectfully prays that if any addition is sustained

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) , JABALPUR vs. M/S. JABALPUR HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the Cross objections filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 19/JAB/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaledcit, Vs. Jabalpur Hospital & Central Circle, Researchcentre,Pvtltd Ramnath Russel Crossing, Building,Napier Town, Napier Town, Jabalpur-482001, Jabalpur-482001 Madhya Pradesh. Madhya Pradesh Pan/Gir No. : Aabcj1959K Appellant .. Respondent Co.No.04/Jab/2019 (A.Y. 2016-17) (In Ita No.19/Jab/2019) Jabalpur Hospital & Vs. Dcit, Research Centre Pvt Ltd, Central Circle, Russel Crossing, Ramnath Napier Town, Building,Napier Town, Jabalpur-482001. Jabalpur-482001. Madhya Pradesh. Madhya Pradesh. Pan/Gir No. : Aabcj1959K Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj Ghai.CA.ARFor Respondent: Shri Saad Kidwai. CIT-DR
Section 142(1)

depreciation is allowable as per rate prescribed. The items mentioned in the details of fixed assets cannot form part of taxable income as per the accounting principle. The A.O. can make addition only when the fixed assets has been purchased out of the unaccounted investment. A.O can only make addition in respect of consumables treating the same as unaccounted stock