BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai896Delhi710Bangalore336Kolkata298Chennai247Ahmedabad141Hyderabad71Pune63Jaipur59Karnataka53Chandigarh48Raipur46Cuttack39Lucknow34Indore34Surat33Visakhapatnam31Rajkot31Cochin30Jodhpur22Calcutta11Nagpur11Telangana10Agra8SC7Amritsar6Patna5Jabalpur4Kerala4Panaji3Varanasi3Guwahati2Orissa2Ranchi1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)12Section 2638Section 1484Section 271(1)(b)4Section 142(1)4Section 404Section 44A4Deduction4Depreciation4Section 1

M/S AMBIKA TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 187/JAB/2013[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur16 Feb 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 40Section 44A

263) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for assessment years (AYs.) 2002-03 and 2003-04 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jabalpur (‘CIT(A)’ for short) vide a common order dated 01/01/2013. The appeals raising a common issue, were heard together, and are being disposed of per a common order for the sake of convenience

M/S AMBIKA TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are dismissed

2
Penalty2
Reassessment2
ITA 188/JAB/2013[2003-04]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jabalpur
16 Feb 2022
AY 2003-04

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 40Section 44A

263) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for assessment years (AYs.) 2002-03 and 2003-04 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jabalpur (‘CIT(A)’ for short) vide a common order dated 01/01/2013. The appeals raising a common issue, were heard together, and are being disposed of per a common order for the sake of convenience

SHRI DIGPAL JAISWAL,KATNI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1 , KATNI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 42/JAB/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Nov 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. K P Dewani, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT-DR
Section 1Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263Section 271(1)(b)Section 40

Depreciation granted @ 30% on Dumpers which is excessive as Dumper is not a motor lorry. 6. The ld. PCIT has observed that non-application of mind for proper examination of case has rendered the order erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. 7. In the case of assessee, regular assessment has been made

SHRI DIGPAL JAISWAL,KATNI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JABALPUR

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 83/JAB/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Nov 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. K P Dewani, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT-DR
Section 1Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263Section 271(1)(b)Section 40

Depreciation granted @ 30% on Dumpers which is excessive as Dumper is not a motor lorry. 6. The ld. PCIT has observed that non-application of mind for proper examination of case has rendered the order erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. 7. In the case of assessee, regular assessment has been made