Search: depreciation

5 results for “depreciation”+ Section 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)13 Section 26310 Deduction5 Section 1484 Section 271(1)(b)4 Section 142(1)4 Section 404 Section 44A4 Depreciation4 Section 143

M/S.ANUJ KUMAR AGRAWAL,BATUL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , BATUL

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 126/JAB/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur10 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Aroraassessment Year:2010-11 M/S. Anuj Kumar Agarwal, Vs. Income Tax Officer, College Road, Betulganj, Aaykarbhawan, Civil Lines, Betul (Mp) 460001 Betul (M.P.) Pan: Aaofa3419K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 263

section 263 order, i.e., to enhancing the income as originally assessed by Rs.5,69,330, even as held by the ld. CIT(A). We, however, do not think so; the revision clearly requiring a fresh consideration of the stated issues as per law after hearing the assessee. The use of the words ‘do novo

M/S AMBIKA TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are dismissed

M/S.ANUJ KUMAR AGRAWAL,BATUL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , BATUL

M/S AMBIKA TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,

M/S.ANUJ KUMAR AGRAWAL,BATUL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , BATUL

M/S AMBIKA TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,

M/S AMBIKA TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,

SHRI DIGPAL JAISWAL,KATNI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1 , KATNI

SHRI DIGPAL JAISWAL,KATNI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JABALPUR