Search: depreciation

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 25clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3 Section 40A(3)3 Addition to Income3 Section 2632 Disallowance2

RAJEEV MISHRA,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, SEONI, SEONI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 152/JAB/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69

25% of the same and accordingly depreciation of Rs.45,942/- was disallowed. The assessee had also claimed depreciation on site office of Rs.29,795/-, but did not submit any bills or vouchers in this regard. Therefore, the ld. AO disallowed this claimed expenditure. Assessee had also claimed Rs.44,465/- as office expenses and Rs.90,241/- as site office expenses

RAJEEV MISHRA,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, SEONI, SEONI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

RAJEEV MISHRA,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, SEONI, SEONI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

M/S.ANUJ KUMAR AGRAWAL,BATUL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , BATUL