Search: depreciation

7 results for “depreciation”+ Section 147clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)15 Section 2638 Section 44A7 Section 80I6 Deduction6 Depreciation6 Section 1485 Addition to Income5 Section 271(1)(b)4 Section 142(1)

SMT. LALITA BAI KHANDELWAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 207/JAB/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur03 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year:2007-08 Smt. Lalita Bai Khandelwal V. Income Tax Officer Mangalwara Chouraha Ward 1 Babai, Hoshangabad

For Appellant: Shri L. L. Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. D. Chougale, D.R

Section 143(3)Section 147

147, if the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year, he may subject to the provisions of sections 148 to 153, assess or reassess such income and also any other income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment and which comes to his notice subsequently in the course

M/S AMBIKA TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are dismissed

SMT. LALITA BAI KHANDELWAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1,

M/S AMBIKA TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,

SMT. LALITA BAI KHANDELWAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1,

M/S AMBIKA TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,

M/S AMBIKA TRANSPORT CO. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,

M/S BINDRA WAREHOUSING CORPORATION vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1),

SHRI DIGPAL JAISWAL,KATNI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1 , KATNI

SHRI DIGPAL JAISWAL,KATNI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JABALPUR

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(1), JABALPUR vs. M/S. MAHAKAUSHAL SUGAR & POWER INDUSTRIES LTD., NARSINGHPUR