M/S.ANUJ KUMAR AGRAWAL,BATUL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , BATUL
In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed
ITA 126/JAB/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur10 Dec 2019AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Aroraassessment Year:2010-11 M/S. Anuj Kumar Agarwal, Vs. Income Tax Officer, College Road, Betulganj, Aaykarbhawan, Civil Lines, Betul (Mp) 460001 Betul (M.P.) Pan: Aaofa3419K (Appellant) (Respondent)
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 263
section 263 order, i.e., to enhancing the income as originally assessed by Rs.5,69,330, even as held by the ld.
CIT(A). We, however, do not think so; the revision clearly requiring a fresh consideration of the stated issues as per law after hearing the assessee. The use of the words ‘do novo
