Search: depreciation

3 results for “depreciation”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)11 Section 2638 Section 1484 Section 271(1)(b)4 Section 142(1)4 Penalty3 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3 Section 12 Section 143

SHRI DIGPAL JAISWAL,KATNI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JABALPUR

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 83/JAB/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Nov 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. K P Dewani, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT-DR

Section 1Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263Section 271(1)(b)Section 40

depreciation claimed at Rs.4,28,602/- is correctly allowed in accordance with law and there is no scope to excessive power u/s 263 of I.T. Act 1961. 6. The Hon'ble Pr. CIT-2, Jabalpur has set aside the assessment framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 despite of the fact findi ngs recorded by A.O. in reassessment framed pursuance

SHRI DIGPAL JAISWAL,KATNI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JABALPUR

SHRI DIGPAL JAISWAL,KATNI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JABALPUR

SHRI DIGPAL JAISWAL,KATNI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1 , KATNI

RAJEEV MISHRA,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, SEONI, SEONI