BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,499Delhi1,932Chennai1,018Bangalore877Ahmedabad601Kolkata504Jaipur269Pune254Hyderabad208Chandigarh190Karnataka155Raipur128Cochin114Visakhapatnam99Indore81Lucknow72Surat65Cuttack60Amritsar48Guwahati41Rajkot40SC35Telangana25Jodhpur24Nagpur23Ranchi19Calcutta10Panaji9Agra8Patna7Varanasi7Kerala6Allahabad5Rajasthan5Orissa3Dehradun3Gauhati2Jabalpur2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Punjab & Haryana1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 80I6Section 1473Section 44A3Section 40A(3)3Section 143(3)2Depreciation2Addition to Income2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 104/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

depreciation and find no error in the order of the CIT(A) in deleting the addition. Therefore, we find no merit in ground No. 2 of the Revenue’s appeal. 12. Ground No. 3 is regarding allowing the relief of Rs.1,01,612/- out of total disallowance of Rs.1,21,807/- made by the Assessing Officer

M/S BINDRA WAREHOUSING CORPORATION vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1),

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 153/JAB/2016[2008-09]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jabalpur
30 Sept 2021
AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Bleassessment Year : 2008-09 Bindra Warehousing Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ward-1(1), Corporation, Itarsi

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 44ASection 80Section 80I

depreciation and imposing the tax on the same which is neither correct nor justified therefore same is liable to be deleted. However, prior to arguing the same, the ld. Counsel for the assessee, Shri Mishra, would plead for admission of legal Grounds (Gds. 3 & 4), reading as under, also praying for their adjudication first inasmuch as the acceptance thereof, where