4 results for “depreciation”+ Business Incomeclear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed
Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleashwani Kumar Sehgal Vs. Ito-1. M/S. Sehgal Industries, Katni-483501, Madhav Nagar Gate, Madhyapradesh. Katni-483501, Madhyapradesh. Pan/Gir No. : Ajgps0132E Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri.Sapanusrethe, Advocate.Ar Respondentby : Shri.Shivkumar. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 18.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21.09.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) Delhi /Cit(A) A Passed U/Sec 154 & 250 Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal.
business running on Hire. The AO dealt on the facts and CBDT circular and observed that Ashwani Kumar Sehgal, Jabalpur. the assessee is entitled for the depreciation@15% on the WDV. Whereas the assessee has claimed the higher rate of deprecation and made disallowance of excess claim of depreciation of Rs. 89,108/- and assessed the total income