Search: condonation of delay

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ TDSclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 200A10 Section 80P10 Section 1488 TDS8 Section 2506 Section 234E5 Section 1474 Deduction4 Section 194J3 Section 12A

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 194CSection 234BSection 234DSection 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 40

delay in filing the same is condoned. 3. The facts of the case are that the assessee is a firm of Civil Contractors. A return declaring total income of Rs.28,99,430/- was filed on 31.10.2017. On gross contract receipts of Rs.12,16,02,736/-, the assessee firm declared net profit before interest and salary to partners at Rs.89

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

I M C OF ITI ,GOTEGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTION), JABALPURAN

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE ,JABALPUR vs. CPC-TDS, KARNATAK

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER , CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE ,JABALPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

CHIEF MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICE ANNUPPUR,ANNUPPUR vs. ITO-TDS-2,JABALPUR, JABALPUR

BIRLA CABLE LIMITED,REWA vs. ACIT,CPC-TDS, BHOPAL

M/S. VALLABH MARKET,GADARWARA vs. PR. CIT-1, , JABALPUR