BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai928Mumbai880Kolkata597Delhi478Bangalore294Hyderabad275Ahmedabad242Pune229Jaipur215Chandigarh168Lucknow92Karnataka88Surat88Raipur78Indore76Cuttack73Visakhapatnam54Nagpur53Rajkot51Amritsar51Cochin49Calcutta44Patna35Jodhpur24SC23Guwahati18Telangana17Allahabad14Panaji12Varanasi9Agra9Dehradun8Rajasthan5Jabalpur3Ranchi3Andhra Pradesh2Orissa2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Section 194J3Condonation of Delay3Section 1442Addition to Income2Natural Justice2

SUSHIL KUMAR,NARSINGHPUR vs. ITO, WARD, NARSINGHPUR, NARSINGHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 20/JAB/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: 2017-18 Sushil Kumar Ito, Ward Narsinghpur V. Main Road,Gandhi Ward, Income Tax Officer Ward, Kandeli, Narsinghpur, Mp- Narsinghpur, Mp-487001. 487001. Pan:Awwpk7164R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Sapan Usrethe, Adv. Respondent By: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 22 05 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 11 06 2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144Section 69A

Loss Account despite he made addition of Rs. 13,38,000/- as unexplained money hence the order is bad. 10. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in upholding the additions made by the Ld. AO in violation of Principle of Natural Justice. Thus, the addition is bad in law and should be deleted. 11. That the Assessee craves leave

JITENDRA PRATAP SINGH BAGRI,SATNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD , , SATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 31/JAB/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur15 Sept 2023AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sapan Usrethe, Adv.ARFor Respondent: Shri Shiv Kumar.Sr.-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 234BSection 250Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay and admit the appeal 4. The brief facts of the case are that, the assessee has not filed the return of income u/sec 139 of the Act. The Assessing Officer(AO) has received the information that the assessee has not submitted the return of income though the assessee was engaged in the commodity trading transactions and there

CHIEF MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICE ANNUPPUR,ANNUPPUR vs. ITO-TDS-2,JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 84/JAB/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleita No. 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 & 89/Jab/2023 (A.Y: 2014-15 To 2019-20) Chief Medical & Vs. Ito, Tds-2, Health Office, Room No. 102, Aayakar Amarkant Road, Bhawan, Napier Town, Annuppur-484224, Jabalpur-482001, Madhya Pradesh. Madhya Pradesh.

For Appellant: Shri.Sapan Usrethe. Adv.ARFor Respondent: Shri.SaadKidwai. CIT -DR
Section 194JSection 201(1)

condone the delay and admit the appeals. 3. Since the issues involved in these appeals are common and identical, hence are clubbed, heard and consolidated order is passed. For the sake of convenience, we shall take up the ITA No. 84/JAB/2023 for the A.Y.2014-15 as a lead case and the facts narrated. The assessee has raised the following grounds