BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80Pclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune228Mumbai220Chennai178Bangalore146Cochin133Panaji92Kolkata48Ahmedabad44Hyderabad32Raipur30Delhi29Jaipur28Nagpur28Visakhapatnam22Chandigarh20Lucknow19Indore17Surat16Karnataka16Rajkot13Patna4Jabalpur2Calcutta2Jodhpur1Amritsar1Guwahati1Agra1SC1

Key Topics

Section 80P10Section 1488Section 1474Section 2502Section 143(2)2Deduction2TDS2Disallowance2Addition to Income2Limitation/Time-bar

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, all the three appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 149/JAB/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, Advocate & ShFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80P

section 80P. However, the ld. CIT(A) noted that the appeal was delayed and the assessee had not brought on record any sufficient reasonable cause for the inordinate delay in filing the appeal. Therefore, by relying on the decision of the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Gupta Emeralds Mines (P.) Ltd. vs. PCIT (2023) 156 taxman.com (Rajasthan

2

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, all the three appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 151/JAB/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, Advocate & ShFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80P

section 80P. However, the ld. CIT(A) noted that the appeal was delayed and the assessee had not brought on record any sufficient reasonable cause for the inordinate delay in filing the appeal. Therefore, by relying on the decision of the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Gupta Emeralds Mines (P.) Ltd. vs. PCIT (2023) 156 taxman.com (Rajasthan