Search: condonation of delay

10 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 27clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(2)16 Section 1116 Section 14816 Section 1478 Section 143(1)7 Addition to Income6 Section 148A4 Section 115B4 Condonation of Delay

SHARDA BAL KALYAN SAMITI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 160/JAB/2023[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Jabalpur17 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat

For Appellant: Dr. H. S. Modh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shravan Kumar Meena, CIT(DR)

Section 11Section 115BSection 147Section 148Section 148A

27,76,440/- as income without any basis is unjustified. 4 That the NFAC Center has added Rs.12,19,810/- deposited in bank for which no specific query has been raised at any stage is erroneous and bad in law. 5 That the Addition made at Rs.34,01,925/- considering the filing of Form 10B delayed without considering the notifications

SHARDA BAL KALYAN SAMITI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION

SHARDA BAL KALYAN SAMITI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION

SHARDA BAL KALYAN SAMITI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION

SHARDA BAL KALYAN SAMITI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION

SHARDA BAL KALYAN SAMITI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION

RAI SAHAB BHAIYALAL DUBEY EDUCATIONAL AND MEDICAL CHARITABLE TRUST,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), JABALPUR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE, JABALPUR vs. SHRI MANISH KUMAR SARAOGI, KATNI

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IN- SITU), CENTRAL CIRCLE, JABALPUR, JABALPUR vs. MANISH KUMAR SAROGI, KATNI

RAJEEV MISHRA,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, SEONI, SEONI

SANJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL,KOTMA vs. ACIT,CIRCLE,KATNI, KATNI

M/S. VALLABH MARKET,GADARWARA vs. PR. CIT-1, , JABALPUR