BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 264clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi133Karnataka112Mumbai93Chennai84Bangalore73Kolkata64Ahmedabad41Calcutta37Hyderabad27Rajkot21Jaipur20Pune15Cochin14Indore13Chandigarh11Panaji10Amritsar10Cuttack10Patna7Lucknow6Telangana6SC4Surat4Nagpur4Visakhapatnam3Jodhpur3Orissa2Jabalpur2Guwahati2Dehradun2Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1Agra1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 44A4Section 2644Section 271B3Section 2712Section 1442Section 2542Limitation/Time-bar2Condonation of Delay2

VICKY NAVANI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), JABALPUR, WARD )), JABALPUR

In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 124/JAB/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 253(3)Section 271Section 271BSection 273BSection 275Section 44A

delay explained is not falling within the provisions of section 273B of ITA 1961. I therefore hold that appellant has failed to meet the tests laid down in IT Act, 1961 and Ld.JAO has rightly imposed penalty. Dismissed also as the Hon'ble Cochin ITAT in the case of M/s. Paravur Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs ITO in ITA No.105/Coch/2023

RAJMATA KAVITESHWARI DEVI,SATNA vs. INCOMETAX OFFICER , SATNA

ITA 107/JAB/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur12 Mar 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 144Section 147Section 254Section 264

264 of I.T. Act; and thereby restoring the aforesaid ex parte assessment order dated 05.12.2018 of the Assessing Officer. (B.1) Thereafter, the assessee filed appeal in the office of the Ld. CIT(A). Vide impugned appellate order dated 16.04.2024, the assessee’s appeal was dismissed by the Ld. First Appellate Authority (“FAA”, for short) both on limitation ground