BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 251(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai88Mumbai74Ahmedabad71Pune64Delhi61Raipur60Kolkata47Bangalore42Jaipur39Hyderabad38Nagpur22Lucknow21Surat17Indore17Panaji16Patna16Chandigarh14Rajkot9Amritsar5Jodhpur5Visakhapatnam3Cochin3Cuttack3Guwahati3Jabalpur3SC1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 2506Section 1476Section 271(1)(c)6Section 1444Section 69A3Addition to Income3Section 251(1)(a)2Section 44A2Cash Deposit

DINESH JAT,SAGAR vs. CIT (A), SAGAR

ITA 195/JAB/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Jaiswal Sancheti, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. N.M. Prasad, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 147Section 250Section 251(1)(a)Section 271(1)(c)Section 44ASection 69A

251(1)(a). It is respectfully prayed that a consistent approach may kindly be adopted in the present appeal for AY 2013-14 as well. 3. Non-Receipt of Notices - Assessment Made in Violation of Natural Justice The appellant respectfully submits that no notice under sections 148, 142(1), or 144 was served at his correct residential address, and therefore

2
Penalty2
Reassessment2
Reopening of Assessment2

DINESH JAT,SAGAR vs. CIT(A), NFAC

ITA 196/JAB/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Jaiswal Sancheti, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. N.M. Prasad, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 147Section 250Section 251(1)(a)Section 271(1)(c)Section 44ASection 69A

251(1)(a). It is respectfully prayed that a consistent approach may kindly be adopted in the present appeal for AY 2013-14 as well. 3. Non-Receipt of Notices - Assessment Made in Violation of Natural Justice The appellant respectfully submits that no notice under sections 148, 142(1), or 144 was served at his correct residential address, and therefore

DAYA RAM YADAV,MANDLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 71/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 253(3)Section 69A

1 O R D E R (A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.71/JBP/2025 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017-18 against impugned appellate order dated 02/05/2024 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1064591834(1) of Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“JCIT(A)” for short]. (B) This appeal has been filed by the assessee, beyond time limit prescribed under section