NAGENDRA PRATAP SINGH,SINGRAULI vs. ITO, SINGRAULI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 195/JAB/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: 2017-18 Nagendra Pratap Singh V. Income Tax Officer Prop. M/S. Prem Kanta Indane, Itd, Singrauli-486788 Old Dudhichua Road, Singrauli- 486788. Tan/Pan:Asaps8528D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Shri N. M. Prasad, Sr. Cit(Dr-1) Date Of Hearing: 20 08 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 08 2025 O R D E R
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri N. M. Prasad, Sr. CIT(DR-1)
Section 144Section 148Section 148A
3) of the IT Act, I am not satisfied that the appellate had sufficient cause for not presenting the appeal within the specified period. Hence, since, appeal was not filed within prescribed time as provided in the section 249(2) of the IT Act, the same is not admitted.
4. In view of the above facts, the appeal is dismissed