Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Patna466 Pune431 Chennai431 Bangalore225 Delhi213 Mumbai95 Nagpur78 Visakhapatnam59 Hyderabad54 Cochin44 Jaipur40 Karnataka21 Dehradun21 Surat19 Kerala19 Ahmedabad13 Agra10 Amritsar10 Kolkata10 Lucknow10 Panaji10 Jodhpur9 Indore8 Rajkot8 Raipur6 Chandigarh5 Ranchi4 Guwahati2 Jabalpur2

Key Topics

Section 200A5 Section 234E5 TDS2 Natural Justice2

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER , CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE ,JABALPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur18 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Shidharth Seth.Adv. ARFor Respondent: Shri.RajeshKumarGupta.Sr.DR

Section 154Section 156Section 190Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 203ASection 204Section 234ESection 285

condone the delay and admit the appeals. 3. Since the issues involved in these appeals are common and identical, hence are clubbed, heard and consolidated order is passed. For the sake of convenience, we shall take up the ITA No.4/JAB/2023 for the A.Y.2013-14(Quarter-4) as a lead case and the facts narrated. The assessee has raised the following grounds

BIRLA CABLE LIMITED,REWA vs. ACIT,CPC-TDS, BHOPAL

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5/JAB/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Mar 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Halder, Sr. DR

Section 200ASection 250

section 200A of the Act. The CPC has passed order against the assessee under s. 200A of the Act for the Quarters 3 and 4 with regard to TDS and demands for Rs. 60,840/- and Rs.22,890/-, including interest at Rs. 6,516/- and 448/-, raised for the said two Quarters respectively. Aggrieved with the order