Search: condonation of delay

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 143(1)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 115B10 Section 143(1)7 Section 143(3)6 Section 143(2)3 Section 113 Section 2502 Section 2632 Section 452 Natural Justice

JABALPUR ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEXES PRIVATE LIMITED,JABALPUR vs. DCIT, CPC, BENGALURU & DCIT, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 184/JAB/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Apoorva Rajesh Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 115BSection 143(1)Section 250

143(1)(a), it would have realized its mistake and corrected the same. However, since no such notice was issued to the assessee, the assessee did not have opportunity to rectify this error. In its submissions before the ld. JCIT(A), the assessee has cited the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Straw

JABALPUR ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEXES PRIVATE LIMITED,JABALPUR vs. DCIT, CPC, BENGALURU & DCIT, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

SPARSH ASSOCIATION OF DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONALS & CONSULTANTS,REWA vs. ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, REWA

JABALPUR ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEXES PRIVATE LIMITED,JABALPUR vs. DCIT, CPC, BENGALURU & DCIT, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

SPARSH ASSOCIATION OF DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONALS & CONSULTANTS,REWA vs. ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, REWA

GAURAV SINGH,SATNA vs. ITO-WARD SATNA, SATNA

AVNISH KUMAR GUPTA,SIDHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, REWA

AVNISH KUMAR GUPTA,SIDHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, REWA, REWA

YUVIKA ALLOYS,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), JABALPUR

SHRI VISHAL SETHI,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(3), JABALPUR