BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 127(2)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai136Karnataka123Delhi113Chennai93Kolkata66Jaipur64Chandigarh58Bangalore57Hyderabad45Calcutta41Ahmedabad41Lucknow26Pune22Visakhapatnam19Amritsar19Cochin18Surat18Raipur16Indore15Rajkot15Nagpur9Guwahati6Agra5Ranchi5SC5Telangana5Cuttack4Kerala4Jodhpur3Patna3Dehradun3Allahabad3Jabalpur2Varanasi2Orissa2Andhra Pradesh1Gauhati1Rajasthan1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 80G(5)6Natural Justice2

GOSAL SAGAR HELPING HAND FOUNDATION,JABALPUR vs. CIT EXCEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 47/JAB/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 May 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: 2024-25 Gosal Sagar Helping Hand Cit Exemption V. Foundation Income Tax Department, C/O Mujahid Ansari & Co., Cit Exemptions, Bhopal Mominpura Street, Gohalpur- (Mp). 482002. Pan:Aagag6146G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 20 05 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 21 05 2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

2 of 4 3. However, the Respondent has rejected the application contending that the time limit for filing Form 10AB is within six months from the activities stated by the Appellant trust. The Respondent further argues that this deadline was extended by CBDT Circular No. 8/2022 dated 31.03.2022, up to 30.09.2022. 4. The crux of the matter lies

YUVIKA ALLOYS,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4/JAB/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble & Sh. Manomohan Das, Hon‟Bleassessment Year: 2016-17 Yuvika Alloys, Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ward -1(1), Jabalpur Jabalpur [Pan : Aabfy 1482H] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Rajeev Nema, Advocate Respondent By Sh. S.K. Halder, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 23/02/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 08/03/2022

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)

2 Yuvika Alloys v. ITO 5.2 The ld. CIT(A), next, proceeds to adjudicate the appeal on merits which, perhaps, is indicative of his inclination to condone the delay. However, a perusal of his order (paras 6 to 8) reveals no adjudication on merits, as stated, so that it is only apparently or ostensibly so. The impugned order