SHRI KAMLA JANHITYA SAMITI,SATNA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, the Assessee’s appeal is dismissed as not maintainable

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) dated 03/03/2021, refusing to condone the delay

LATE SMT SAMPAT BAI JAIN SMRITI SAMITI RUPESH JAIN ABHINAV X RAY, M G ROAD SATNA,SATNA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -EXEMPTION WARD, JABALPUR(M.P), JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed as not maintainable

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) dated 15/03/2022, refusing to condone the delay

SHRI NAMIYUN PARASHVANATH JAIN SWETAMBER MANIDHARI TRUST,JABALPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXAMPTION)), BHOPAL

In the result, assessee‟s appeal is dismissed as not maintainable

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟, hereinafter) for assessment year (AY) 2018-19. 2. At the very outset, it was observed by the Bench that the assessee has, and only rightly so, moved an application (through it‟s counsel, Shri Bardia), seeking permission for withdrawal of the instant appeal as the same

SHRI SAJJAN SINGH SHIKSHA SAMITI,REWA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXAMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed as not maintainable

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Sanjay Arora

119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) read with Rule 12(2) and the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (‘the Rules’ hereinafter) by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Bhopal (‘CIT(E)’ for short) dated 08.7.2020. 2. The facts of the case, to the extent relevant, are that the assessee, a Society registered under section

SHRI NAMIYUN PARSWANATH JAIN, SWETAMBER MANIDHARI TRUST,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTION), JABALPUR

In the result, impugned order is set aside and appeal by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes”

119(2) dated 11.09.2020 denying condonation of delay being more than 365 days as against the due date of 31.10.2018, whereas it was claimed that delay be computed u/s 139 as per CBDT circular 02/2020 dt 3.1.2020 w.e.f due date being 31 March of every asstt. year, I e. For the A.Y. 2018-19- 31.03.2019 and thus 10B form filed