Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10(46)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 115B10 Section 80P10 Section 1488 Section 143(1)5 Section 2504 Section 1474 Section 143(2)2 Deduction2 TDS2

JABALPUR ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEXES PRIVATE LIMITED,JABALPUR vs. DCIT, CPC, BENGALURU & DCIT, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 184/JAB/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Apoorva Rajesh Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 115BSection 143(1)Section 250

46,60,130/-. The same was processed under section 143(1) on 27.05.2024 at the same returned income, but the refund of Rs.57,080/- was denied and instead a demand of Rs.33,55,310/- was determined, due to non-grant of benefit of new regime taxation opted by the assessee under section 115BAA of the Income

JABALPUR ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEXES PRIVATE LIMITED,JABALPUR vs. DCIT, CPC, BENGALURU & DCIT, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

JABALPUR ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEXES PRIVATE LIMITED,JABALPUR vs. DCIT, CPC, BENGALURU & DCIT, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR