KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI,NARSINGPUR vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

10(26AAB) of IT Act, learned CIT(A) grossly erred in confirming income assessed at Rs.2695550/-. 5. Assessment order passed by the ld AO and confirming by Ld. CIT(A) is bad in law and on facts.” (B) For the sake of convenience, these two appeals are disposed of through this consolidated order. First, I.T.A. No.148/JAB/2024 is taken

KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI ,NARSINGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR