Search: capital gains

6 results for “capital gains”+ Section 55(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 37(1)9 Section 405 Disallowance5 Addition to Income5 Section 143(3)3 Business Income3 Section 2632 Section 452 Section 482

SHRI VISHAL SETHI,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(3), JABALPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 57/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur07 Sept 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesan & Shri Sanjay Aroraassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 45Section 48Section 50C

55 days in presenting this appeal before the Tribunal. 3.1 The assessee’s case is that the impugned order is bad in law inasmuch as the it travels beyond the scope of enquiry for which the assessee’s return of income for relevant year, filed on 6.9.2014, was selected for verification by the issue of notice u/s. 143(2

SHRI VISHAL SETHI,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(3), JABALPUR

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-KATNI, KATNI vs. J.P. TOBACCO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD, DAMOH

SHRI VISHAL SETHI,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(3), JABALPUR

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-KATNI, KATNI vs. J.P. TOBACCO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD, DAMOH

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE KATNI, KATNI vs. J.P TOBACCO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD, DAMOH

J.P TOBACCO PRODUCT PVT. LTD. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,,

J.P TOBACCO PRODUCT PVT. LTD.,DAMOH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3, SAGAR

J.P TOBACO PRODUCTA PVT. LTD.,DAMOH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - SAGAR, SAGASR