AMBIKA CHARAN DIXIT,JABALPUR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

capital gain. Similar is the position for purchase of assets. The immovable properties / assets those are if any purchased during the year are recorded in the books of account of assessee and reflected in audit report. Source of investment are also incorporated in the books of account. No any other assets / immovable properties were purchased by the assessee during

M/S RPJ MINERALS PVT. LTD ,MAIHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1,SATNA, SATNA

41,229/- of the F.Y.\n2016-17 before the due date of the filing of the income tax return. He, therefore,\nasked the assessee to show cause as to why the same should not be added back to the\nincome of the assessee and upon receiving a reply which suggested that TDS of Rs.\n10\nITA No.154/JAB/2016\nITA No.86/JAB/2022\nA.Ys

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 vs. M/S RPJ MINERALS PRIVATE LTD., SATNA

In the result, ITA No.154/JAB/2016 is held to be allowed for statistical\npurposes while ITA No

41,229/- of the F.Y.\n2016-17 before the due date of the filing of the income tax return. He, therefore,\nasked the assessee to show cause as to why the same should not be added back to the\nincome of the assessee and upon receiving a reply which suggested that TDS of Rs.\n50,0000/- have been deposited before

RITA MANCHANI,JABALPUR vs. ITO WARD 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short) and determined the total income of the assessee at Rs.18,41,770/- by making I.T.A. No.60/JAB/2024 Assessment Year:2013-14 2 addition of Rs.5,53,428/- on account of Short Term Capital Gain. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal in the office of learned CIT(A). Vide impugned