BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 234Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai548Delhi365Bangalore244Ahmedabad137Kolkata80Hyderabad73Jaipur71Chennai64Pune43Nagpur19Raipur17Chandigarh16Indore14Visakhapatnam14Karnataka11Amritsar11Surat11Rajkot10Lucknow8Patna6Agra5Jodhpur4Telangana4Ranchi3Jabalpur3Guwahati3SC3Cuttack2Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 43B6Section 234C6Section 234A4Section 115J3Addition to Income3Section 143(3)2

SUPREME TRACTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,HARYANA BHAWAN vs. DCIT, KATNI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 51/JAB/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur27 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2016-17 Supreme Tractors Pvt Ltd V. Dcit Katni, Madhya Pradesh 483501. Katni, Madhya Pradesh- 483501. Pan:Aajcs4013M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Sahil Gupta, Advocate Respondent By: Shri N. M. Prasad, Sr. Dr-1 Date Of Hearing: 12 02 2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 27 02 2026 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Sahil Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N. M. Prasad, Sr. DR-1
Section 115JSection 234C

section 234C do not apply to cases involving capital gains, in accordance with the first proviso to section 234C. 2. The principle

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 vs. M/S RPJ MINERALS PRIVATE LTD., SATNA

ITA 154/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur19 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Meena, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 43B

234C of I.T. Act 1961 is unjustified, unwarranted and excessive. 8. Any other ground that shall be prayed at the time of hearing." 2. We may take up ITA No. 154/JAB/2016 in the first instance. The facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the development of mining of minerals such as dolomite, limestone, fluorite, chinacly, alumina

M/S RPJ MINERALS PVT. LTD ,MAIHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1,SATNA, SATNA

ITA 86/JAB/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur19 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Meena, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 43B

234C of I.T. Act 1961 is unjustified, unwarranted and excessive. 8. Any other ground that shall be prayed at the time of hearing." 2 ITA No.154/JAB/2016 ITA No.86/JAB/2022 A.Ys. 2012-13 & 2017-18 M/s RPJ Minerals Pvt. Ltd. 2. We may take up ITA No. 154/JAB/2016 in the first instance. The facts of the case are that the assessee