BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 160clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai557Delhi493Bangalore263Chennai163Ahmedabad136Jaipur130Karnataka122Kolkata121Chandigarh85Cochin71Pune55Hyderabad54Indore53Raipur51Nagpur32Rajkot31Visakhapatnam25Surat20Lucknow19Calcutta17Ranchi17Cuttack14SC10Amritsar9Telangana6Guwahati6Agra5Allahabad5Rajasthan4Jodhpur4Dehradun3Jabalpur2Panaji2Andhra Pradesh1Orissa1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 54E4Section 50C4Section 143(3)3Section 483Section 682

SHRI NARESH KUMAR GOLCHHA,KATNI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 90/JAB/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur03 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year:2013-14 Shri Naresh Kumar Golchha V. Pr. C.I.T.-2 C/O Samapat Lal & Sons Jabalpur Raghunath Ganj Katni Tan/Pan:Afhpg3398F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Dr. H. S. Modh, Advocate Respondent By: Shri P. D. Chougale, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 02 04 2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 03 04 2019

For Appellant: Dr. H. S. Modh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. D. Chougale, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 48Section 50CSection 54E

section 50C, the capital gain, after allowing the index cost of the acquisition works out to Rs.82,69,800/-; that the assessee is eligible for deduction of Rs.43,40,000/- u/s. 54EC of the Act, which is more than the capital gain of Rs.34,88,000/- worked out on the actual sale consideration; that the plots from which the capital

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. TARUN DEVCON PRIVATE LIMITED, JABALPUR

In the result, the Revenues’ appeal is dismissed in terms of the foregoing

ITA 18/JAB/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Dec 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 10(38)Section 131Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for assessment year (AY) 2015- 16 vide order dated 26.12.2017. 1 | P a g e Dy. CIT vs. Tarun Devcon (P.) Ltd. 2.1 The facts of the case in brief are that the assessee, a private limited company in the business of real estate development, having its’ registered